Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Distinguish between assoc arrays and objects in validation messages #25

Open
scaytrase opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #204
Open

Distinguish between assoc arrays and objects in validation messages #25

scaytrase opened this issue Oct 19, 2019 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #204
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@scaytrase
Copy link
Member

See #17 (comment)
@scaytrase scaytrase added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 8, 2019
@scaytrase scaytrase mentioned this issue Nov 3, 2020
Closed
@lezhnev74
Copy link
Contributor

See #92 as well

@dhaeckel dhaeckel linked a pull request Jul 21, 2023 that will close this issue
Open
@dhaeckel
Copy link

I stumbled upon this problem while debugging a validation failure with a collegue. It took us longer than necessary, to find that we had this exact situation. I created a PR for providing a more suitable validation message and expanded the tests.

@gordinskiy
Copy link

Is there something wrong with the proposed solutions?

Are there any plans to fix this?

@dhaeckel dhaeckel mentioned this issue Jun 20, 2024
Open
@dhaeckel
Copy link

@scaytrase @lezhnev74
Wanted to ping on this issue. If there is anything wrong with my solution let me know, I'm happy to change the PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Use 'object given' in TypeMismatch msg when expecting array dhaeckel/openapi-psr7-validator
4 participants
@scaytrase @lezhnev74 @dhaeckel @gordinskiy