You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
[ ]
您好,打扰了。拜读文章时候有些不解,冒昧请问下这两部分逻辑是什么,是如何能说明多了偏移项C(x)以及系数1/C?“我看第一版写的Substituting πwith πθ(Eq. [4]), we get the model posterior:”没太理解。看了第三版,有些没看懂在pjointπ∗(ν|x,{yi}1:K)和 pjointθ (ν|x,{yi}1:K)间凭什么依据直接设出的π和πθ表达式从而变成了不同形式?且最后 又pjoint(ν|x,{yi})=pjointθ∗ (ν|x,{yi}),得出 rθ∗(x,y)=r(x,y)/α+C(x),那为什么不直接 π*=πθ?期待您的回复,谢谢
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
您好,打扰了。拜读文章时候有些不解,冒昧请问下这两部分逻辑是什么,是如何能说明多了偏移项C(x)以及系数1/C?“我看第一版写的Substituting πwith πθ(Eq. [4]), we get the model posterior:”没太理解。看了第三版,有些没看懂在pjointπ∗(ν|x,{yi}1:K)和 pjointθ (ν|x,{yi}1:K)间凭什么依据直接设出的π和πθ表达式从而变成了不同形式?且最后 又pjoint(ν|x,{yi})=pjointθ∗ (ν|x,{yi}),得出 rθ∗(x,y)=r(x,y)/α+C(x),那为什么不直接 π*=πθ?期待您的回复,谢谢
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: