Use cases for second-level precision in UtcOffset
#338
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
I gone through https://data.iana.org/time-zones/releases/tzdata2021a.tar.gz and at the beginning of XX century, or even until 1972 there were cases of second-level offset, so it may be required for tzdb compatibility. Some examples:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
This discussion is for collecting use cases of having second-level precision in the
UtcOffset
struct. Specifically, I am investigating whether to moveUtcOffset
to only support hours and minutes (possibly, but not likely, restricted to quarter-hour offsets). While I have not checked the time zone database, I'm fairly certain that every location has had UTC offsets that only require minute-level precision for a significant amount of time. Removal of second-level precision will not occur in time 0.3, so there's no need to worry about this being ripped out from under your feet.This capability may be removed in a future release if there is insufficient demand. Leave your use case below, and use the 👍 reaction if you share this use case. Please do not 👍 a use case that you do not actually need this capability for. Off-topic comments will likely be outright deleted.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions