You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to be able to support both backends; It could be the case that the implementation of the SoftDevice backend belongs in tinygo.org/x/bluetooth (or a subpackage). In that case, it might be beneficial to refactor machine.Flash to allow for specifying a "backend" other than the NVMC implementation.
When performing writes via the NVMC registers, the SoftDevice generates an assertion violation if enabled.
In the nRF SDK, there are 2 "backends" for flash storage, one via the NVMC controller (as in
machine.Flash
) and another that designed for compatibility with SoftDevice enabled: https://infocenter.nordicsemi.com/index.jsp?topic=%2Fstruct_sdk%2Fstruct%2Fsdk_nrf5_latest.htmlIt would be nice to be able to support both backends; It could be the case that the implementation of the SoftDevice backend belongs in tinygo.org/x/bluetooth (or a subpackage). In that case, it might be beneficial to refactor
machine.Flash
to allow for specifying a "backend" other than the NVMC implementation.relevant "SD" fstorage backend implementation: https://github.com/cmdwtf/nRF5_SDK/blob/master/components/libraries/fstorage/nrf_fstorage_sd.c
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: