You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for reviewing this dataset; I'm planning to work with it too. Not sure which tool you are using to review it, but at least I'm using Python/Pandas, and I would like to point out some things:
But I have a doubt about the rows 1159 and 2082. The source_article "'Running the government is like running a business. You can’t keep running into debt and expect to be successful.'" has two labels, "fallacy of logic" and "faulty generalization." Which one should be the correct one?
I hope you can review these changes and let me know your thoughts.
Btw, I'm assuming the correct labels are in the first column updated_label
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @tmakesense,
Thanks for reviewing this dataset; I'm planning to work with it too. Not sure which tool you are using to review it, but at least I'm using Python/Pandas, and I would like to point out some things:
First, when I open it like this:
I noticed that some of the last rows have cells in the wrong columns. To fix it, I did:
Second, I still found duplicated fallacies in the
source_article
column. Please take a look at:To fix it, I would propose deleting the following rows:
But I have a doubt about the rows 1159 and 2082. The source_article "'Running the government is like running a business. You can’t keep running into debt and expect to be successful.'" has two labels, "fallacy of logic" and "faulty generalization." Which one should be the correct one?
I hope you can review these changes and let me know your thoughts.
Btw, I'm assuming the correct labels are in the first column
updated_label
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: