nrf52dk needs to use the nrf52840 chip

This isn't _technically_ the best fix, but we pretty much only use the nrf52840. If this actually breaks the nrf52dk we will have to revisit.
tock · May 7, 2024 · 94374e3 · 94374e3
1 parent 5cc38ca
commit 94374e3
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/tockloader/board_interface.py b/tockloader/board_interface.py
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ class BoardInterface:
             "page_size": 4096,
             "no_attribute_table": True,
             "jlink": {
-                "device": "nrf52",
+                "device": "nrf52840_xxAA",
                 "address_maximum": 0x11FFFFFF,
             },
             "openocd": {

diff --git a/tockloader/jlinkexe.py b/tockloader/jlinkexe.py
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ def _get_tockloader_board_from_emulators(self, emulators):
             if emulator["ProductName"] == "J-Link OB-SAM3U128-V2-NordicSem":
                 # This seems to match both the nRF52dk (PCA10040) and the
                 # nRF52840dk (PCA10056). From a jlink perspective, they are
-                # the same, which is nice.
+                # close enough, which is nice.
                 return "nrf52dk"
             if emulator["ProductName"] == "J-Link OB-nRF5340-NordicSemi":
                 # This matches the new (3.0.0+) version of the nRF52840dk