Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Corrected the A+B+C.zip file naming convention #8

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: 2.0
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Corrected the A+B+C.zip file naming convention #8

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
9008967
Corrected the A+B+C.zip file naming convention
anoopemacs Oct 5, 2016
1f2e1ed
Removed duplicate
anoopemacs Oct 6, 2016
e33bee4
Capitalisation correction
anoopemacs Oct 6, 2016
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
6 changes: 4 additions & 2 deletions README.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,8 +31,10 @@ Whenever you sync with the server, a file with the format `{date in GMT}={X}+{Y}
{date in GMT}={B}+{Y}.zip

**Resulting transaction file**
Because `date in GMT of the oldest` < `date in GMT of the youngest`,
{date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip
Resulting transaction file Based on alphabetical order, say if `X < Y`, then: {date in GMT}={X}+{Y}+{Z}.zip
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Were you able to confirm through experiment that is indeed the case?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes,
date in GMT of the oldest < date in GMT of the youngest OR
date in GMT of the oldest > date in GMT of the youngest
has no effect on resulting file name

Hence, in all P+Q+R.zip type filenames, alphabetically `P < Q`
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems incomplete.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+Hence, in all P+Q+R.zip type filenames, alphabetically P < Q

This is an observation that can be made on any OmniFocus.ofocus file: https://www.google.co.in/search?biw=1670&bih=1320&q=inurl:OmniFocus.ofocus/&oq=inurl:OmniFocus.ofocus/&gs_l=serp.3...7590.7590.0.8081.1.1.0.0.0.0.139.139.0j1.1.0....0...1c.1.64.serp..0.0.0.UGJvzosBWME&gws_rd=cr&ei=1Z71V8WkLMPtvASAhJeQBQ

Copy link
Owner

@tomzx tomzx Oct 6, 2016 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've only found one example going through those links, but I'll assume it's a better assumption than the initial one.

However, what I was saying is that this sentence is incomplete (furthermore, it appears to repeat what was said just above).

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed the duplicate now
but, why incomplete?


Any transaction file generated next will henceforth be named {date in GMT}={Z}+{C}.zip, where Z is the randomId generated for the resulting transaction file.
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a duplicate of the line just below.


Any transaction file generated next will henceforth be named `{date in GMT}={Z}+{C}.zip`, where `Z` is the `randomId` generated for the resulting transaction file.

Expand Down