You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Several scientific names are duplicated in the taxon core:
dwc_scientificName
idspecies
ordo
family
genus
Cavia porcellus (Linnaeus 1758)
52831
Rodentia
Caviidae
Cavia
Cavia porcellus (Linnaeus 1758)
900966
NA
Caviidae
Cavia
Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus 1766)
52845
Rodentia
Myoxidae
Eliomys
Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus 1766)
900975
Rodentia
Gliridae
Eliomys
Erinaceus europaeus Linnaeus 1758
52847
Insectivora
Erinaceidae
Erinaceus
Erinaceus europaeus Linnaeus 1758
900977
Insectivora
Erinaceidae
Erinaceus
Hystrix cristata Linnaeus 1758
52858
Rodentia
Istricidae
Hystrix
Hystrix cristata Linnaeus 1758
900984
Cyperales
Istricidae
Hystrix
Mus musculus Linnaeus 1758
52877
Rodentia
Muridae
Mus
Mus musculus Linnaeus 1758
900995
Rodentia
Muridae
Mus
Mustela lutreola
52878
Carnivora
Mustelidae
Mustela
Mustela lutreola
900997
Carnivora
Mustelidae
Mustela
Pecari tajacu (Linnaeus 1758)
52889
Artiodactyla
Tayassuidae
Pecari
Pecari tajacu (Linnaeus 1758)
901002
NA
Tayassuidae
Pecari
Some of these differ in their classification. I compared those species with the GBIF backbone, and suggest to remove those that are not conform to the backbone taxonomy. I suggest to keep the following records in the taxon core:
dwc_scientificName
idspecies
ordo
family
genus
Cavia porcellus (Linnaeus 1758)
52831
Rodentia
Caviidae
Cavia
Eliomys quercinus (Linnaeus 1766)
900975
Rodentia
Gliridae
Eliomys
Erinaceus europaeus Linnaeus 1758
52847
Insectivora
Erinaceidae
Erinaceus
Hystrix cristata Linnaeus 1758
52858
Rodentia
Istricidae
Hystrix
Mus musculus Linnaeus 1758
52877
Rodentia
Muridae
Mus
Mustela lutreola
52878
Carnivora
Mustelidae
Mustela
Pecari tajacu (Linnaeus 1758)
52889
Artiodactyla
Tayassuidae
Pecari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Several scientific names are duplicated in the taxon core:
Some of these differ in their classification. I compared those species with the GBIF backbone, and suggest to remove those that are not conform to the backbone taxonomy. I suggest to keep the following records in the taxon core:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: