Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Game Notes says Long Ranged Aircraft is +1 Movement, but in-game it's +2 #6

Open
rothomp3 opened this issue Jul 21, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@rothomp3
Copy link

So I have a patch to make it +1 in game, which seems to fit better with the other techs in terms of power levels… but I'm not sure if that's the bug or if the bug is in the game notes! Anybody have any idea?

@panther2
Copy link
Contributor

panther2 commented Jul 21, 2020

The rulebook behind this version does not include tecchnology (long range aircraft) at all.
So to find an analogy you need to look into editions where this technology is included:
in v3 it is +2, in Global it is +1.
However I don't know what has been intended in that game here. Usually the v5 and Global rulesets match.

@rothomp3
Copy link
Author

I'll go ahead and submit a PR for making it +1, like I said I think that's a better match to the power level of the other (all optional, yes) techs on this map! If it doesn't get merged that's not a huge deal for me, I only play this map with directly-connected friends who I can send the modified version to, but IMHO it's an overall improvement to this optional feature.

@CharlieAtlas
Copy link

CharlieAtlas commented Nov 27, 2020

I am actually guessing that this one should be movement 2. The game notes say that tech is disabled by default, and that if it is turned on, it is WW2v3 rules. Which it looks like is movement 2.
From line 1924

Also, Technology is turned off by default (if turned on, will use ww2v3 (AA 50th Anniversary Edition) technology).

That means that this needs a game notes update?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants