You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The dataset I am using is me in my house for 2.5 hours with GPS / bluetooth switched on. Most of the data points correctly show in pink as I am in the same location. However, when I use the "Hide < 1hr" it hides all non-travel. I would expect that these locations would be identified as similar enough to be the same location, and therefore that I had been there over an hour, and would not be hidden.
The reason for bug: The data is for 2.5 hrs, in between: you moved to a different location.
When we add a new marker to exposure Set we check the first location point of the last exposure set.
So if you are home: you stayed at home for 35 and 42 mins each, the gap was enough to create a new exposure set. SO total wasn't calculated properly we didn't put the two locations together.
The issue I am facing to fix this bug is:
How many exposure sets do I compare before I plug values in the existing exposure set?
how much time duration before we can say the location is actually new?
The dataset I am using is me in my house for 2.5 hours with GPS / bluetooth switched on. Most of the data points correctly show in pink as I am in the same location. However, when I use the "Hide < 1hr" it hides all non-travel. I would expect that these locations would be identified as similar enough to be the same location, and therefore that I had been there over an hour, and would not be hidden.
Steps to reproduce:
1587216857693.zip
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: