From 52e458ef621973575fbdc533e864726df44ffe15 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel_Doehring Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:41:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Add Paper for Weakly Enforced BCs to Docs --- docs/literate/src/files/non_periodic_boundaries.jl | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/literate/src/files/non_periodic_boundaries.jl b/docs/literate/src/files/non_periodic_boundaries.jl index 7ed6324ff99..853000f6a4d 100644 --- a/docs/literate/src/files/non_periodic_boundaries.jl +++ b/docs/literate/src/files/non_periodic_boundaries.jl @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ # state as arguments, and solves an approximate Riemann problem to introduce dissipation (and # hence stabilization) at the boundary. Hence, the performance of the Dirichlet BC depends on the # fidelity of the numerical surface flux. +# An easy-to read introductory reference on this topic is the paper by +# [Mengaldo et. al.](https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2923). # The passed boundary value function is called with the same arguments as an initial condition # function, i.e.