Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The GLL method cannot perform exact numerical integration for DGSEM ? #2016

Closed
teddyz1999 opened this issue Jul 21, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Comments

@teddyz1999
Copy link

When using GLL nodes, employing the same nodes for both interpolation and quadrature is known as collocation. For example, in solving the Navier-Stokes equations, this method links the degree of interpolation polynomials to the order of exact integration. As a result, the mass matrix in inner product form and the flux term matrix cannot be integrated exactly. How significant is this impact? Does it lead to aliasing errors?

@jlchan
Copy link
Contributor

jlchan commented Jul 21, 2024

It does lead to some under integration errors, but these decrease rapidly as the polynomial degree increases. Moreover, Trixi's VolumeIntegralFluxDifferencing avoids most under integration-based stability issues.

@teddyz1999
Copy link
Author

Understood. Thank you for your response.

@ranocha ranocha closed this as completed Jul 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants