You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I do think it is an issue that it takes too long to run a full round of tests in the CI pipeline. At least from the contributor/developer's point of view, it slows down the feedback loop when debugging.
One straightforward problem is that the test infrastructure is mixed with examples, which introduces some unnecessary output that slow down the tests. So probably tests should be separate from examples.
We concur, the long cycle time for running the full set of tests is annoying. Unfortunately, however, we currently have no better way of testing all features that is sustainable in terms of maintenance. Furthermore, we consider the examples to be part of the Trixi.jl implementation, thus they need to be tested as well.
If you have a concrete suggestion on how to improve testing times without losing coverage and without increasing the test complexity even further, we'd be happy to discuss it!
If you have a concrete suggestion on how to improve testing times without losing coverage and without increasing the test complexity even further, we'd be happy to discuss it!
I can give it a try but it won’t start soon due to my schedule.
I do think it is an issue that it takes too long to run a full round of tests in the CI pipeline. At least from the contributor/developer's point of view, it slows down the feedback loop when debugging.
One straightforward problem is that the test infrastructure is mixed with examples, which introduces some unnecessary output that slow down the tests. So probably tests should be separate from examples.
@ranocha @sloede
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: