Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent order of evaluation for car-atom #163

Closed
vulecoff opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

Inconsistent order of evaluation for car-atom #163

vulecoff opened this issue Oct 18, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
MeTTa Language Problem
Milestone
Month 4 of 5

Comments

@vulecoff
Copy link
Contributor

(car-atom (+ 1 2)) --> [] (should return [+]), whereas (car-atom (cons-atom 1 (2))) --> [cons-atom]. It looks like for some reason arithmetic operations are eagerly evaluated, or maybe it's just that type-checking are not fully implemented in general.
@TeamSPoon TeamSPoon added this to the Month 4 of 5 milestone Nov 11, 2024
@TeamSPoon
Copy link
Collaborator

MeTTa Should evalated Expressions ?

@TeamSPoon
Copy link
Collaborator

(car-atom (+ 1 2)) -> + now

@TeamSPoon
Copy link
Collaborator

370696c

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
MeTTa Language Problem
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Month 4 of 5
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@TeamSPoon @vulecoff