-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reported schema not found in scheme_species_map.tab #128
Comments
Hi, In addition to the posted request above, we would like to know how can we identify L.innocula based on lineage and ST matches? Other than calling all of them as Listeria_2 schema? Please give us your thoughts on it. Thanks, |
The updated version of MLST indeed include the "Listeria_2 scheme", whereas the previous versions included a "lmonocytogenes" scheme that corresponded to the BIGSdb (Pasteur) Listeria monocytogenes MLST scheme. I am kind of confused about the "Listeria_2 scheme", when using it for typing, it detects several alleles at the dapE gene, while this was not detected using the previous scheme. I tested for eventual intra-specific contamination using confindr -rMLST scheme on the listeria isolates I was using, and could not detect anything significant. This is confusing as I cannot trace back the origin of this new scheme (could you add information about the scheme source ?). (detecting, likely incorectly several alleles at a gene is problematic, as thus STs are not assigned, and thus CC groups not identified). Could you provide additonal information ? Best regards |
Hi,
I'm running L. monocytogenes samples and noticed that the reported schema (listeria_2) is not found in scheme_species_map.tab.
scheme_species_map.tab still has lmonocytogenes but db/pubmlst has listeria_2.
I just wanted to let you know about this small difference.
Thanks,
Miguel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: