Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The crystal structure diverged during Relaxation of both atomic positions and the shape of the unit cell using QHA #242

Open
dha2025 opened this issue Dec 17, 2024 Discussed in #240 · 0 comments

Comments

@dha2025
Copy link

dha2025 commented Dec 17, 2024

Discussed in #240

Originally posted by dha2025 December 5, 2024
Dear Dr. Tadano,

Recently, I installed ALAMODE to study the temperature dependence of lattice parameters in anisotropic systems using QHA and SCPH. I followed the steps provided for ZnO and BaTiO3 in the ALAMODE website. I successfully calculated the anharmonic interatomic force constants (IFCs) and performed structural optimization (relaxing atomic positions) without any errors using both methods.

However, when I enabled the “Relax both atomic positions and the shape of the unit cell” tag, I encountered the following warnings and the structure diverged:

  1. Warning in compute_anharmonic_del_v0_del_umn: squared SCP frequency is negative. ik = 3
  2. Warning in compute_anharmonic_v1_array: 0 acoustic modes are detected at the Gamma point.

The crystal structure diverged in both QHA and SCPH calculations, even at 10 K. I reviewed the additional input files and attempted to resolve the issue by adjusting the cluster size and increasing the number of configurations to generate IFCs.

Could you please provide insights into the possible causes of this problem and suggest potential solutions?

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant