Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recover docs from web.archive.org #25

Open
techtonik opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Recover docs from web.archive.org #25

techtonik opened this issue Aug 11, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor

http://web.archive.org/web/20101016075151/http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/DivmodAxiom

@techtonik techtonik changed the title Recover docs from http://web.archive.org/web/20101016075151/http://divmod.org/trac/wiki/DivmodAxiom Recover docs from web.archive.org Aug 11, 2014
@lvh
Copy link
Member

lvh commented Aug 11, 2014

I at some point wrote https://github.com/lvh/axiombook

it may be a good idea to simply incorporate that into twisted/axiom

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Skimming through the book, I still can not get what Axiom is for with its SQLite-only backend. It will help to list alternatives and make a comparison. With Django models, Roundup hyperdb and AppEngine ndb.

It will also help to get attribute type names similar to other frameworks.

And the third thought - if Axiom could be a decoupled model from anything - that would help greatly to migrate data from Django to Roundup to AppEngine etc.

@lvh
Copy link
Member

lvh commented Aug 11, 2014

Ehhh, yeah, it's pretty different from those. Unfortunately I don't have the time or inclination to work on it anymore :(

@techtonik
Copy link
Contributor Author

Then the good way would be to properly freeze by listing missing parts, things that are not implemented elsewhere and alternatives that can serve as a replacement or a better way for certain tasks. I think that would be useful, because Axiom is already listed in some places on the Internet. I came here from Python wiki.

@glyph
Copy link
Member

glyph commented Jan 10, 2015

@lvh - I'm on board with integrating that stuff, if you still think that would be a good idea.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants