-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sorting based on total score #3
Comments
What is the ratio of upvotes to down votes for that article? Is the total number of votes for the other articles significantly higher? I agree, 64 vs 7 is a very high difference, but this might be because Evaluate doesn't sort directly by Up Votes vs Down Vote. You can read about why, here;
|
The metric in question is one-way: there are only votes up. If you want to The article in question (with 64 votes) has the highest number of votes on the site. On Nov 8, 2014 9:01 AM, "Devindra Payment" [email protected] wrote:
|
For reddit-style metrics (voting up/down) the way total score is sorted is broken. If sorted in descending order, a total score of 9 will be shown about a total score of 64: sorting appears to be based on the first digit, as opposed to the actual numerical value. Perhaps the scores are being sorted as text, as opposed to numbers?
Screenshot: http://wiki.ubc.ca/images/4/43/Evaluate-sorting.png
(scores of 7 appear above the score of 64)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: