Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods #856

Merged

Conversation

akulk022
Copy link
Collaborator

@akulk022 akulk022 commented Nov 7, 2023

After adding com.google.common to annotated packages for buildWithNullAway in JSpecify Mode, we got the following exception:

error: An unhandled exception was thrown by the Error Prone static analysis plugin.
    return findEnclosingMethodOrLambdaOrInitializer(path, ImmutableSet.of());

com.google.common.util.concurrent.UncheckedExecutionException: java.lang.NullPointerException: castToNonNull failed!
        at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$Segment.get(LocalCache.java:2086)
        at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.get(LocalCache.java:4012)
        at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache.getOrLoad(LocalCache.java:4035)
        at com.google.common.cache.LocalCache$LocalLoadingCache.get(LocalCache.java:5011)

Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException: castToNonNull failed!
        at com.uber.nullaway.NullabilityUtil.castToNonNull(NullabilityUtil.java:409)
        at com.uber.nullaway.GenericsChecks.getGenericReturnNullnessAtInvocation(GenericsChecks.java:800)
        at com.uber.nullaway.dataflow.AccessPathNullnessPropagation.genericReturnIsNullable(AccessPathNullnessPropagation.java:1031)
        at com.uber.nullaway.dataflow.AccessPathNullnessPropagation.returnValueNullness(AccessPathNullnessPropagation.java:1008)
        at com.uber.nullaway.dataflow.AccessPathNullnessPropagation.visit

With the call to java ImmutableSet.of() which is a static call, we were wrongly trying to return null from getTreeType in GenericChecks.java for this case which caused the above Exception.

A unit test which reproduces the issue has been added to NullAwayJSpecifyGenerickChecks.java:

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
class Test {
    static void funcImmutableSet(ImmutableSet<Object> is){
    }
    static void testNegative() {
		//We were getting the issue on this line
        funcImmutableSet(ImmutableSet.of());
    }
}

All the unit tests from the NullAway build have passed for these changes.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (5fc285b) 86.93% compared to head (54bc881) 86.95%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #856      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     86.93%   86.95%   +0.01%     
- Complexity     1886     1889       +3     
============================================
  Files            74       74              
  Lines          6215     6215              
  Branches       1208     1208              
============================================
+ Hits           5403     5404       +1     
  Misses          405      405              
+ Partials        407      406       -1     
Files Coverage Δ
...rc/main/java/com/uber/nullaway/GenericsChecks.java 90.28% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@msridhar msridhar changed the title JSpecify: fixing buildWithNullAway com.google.common package issue JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods Nov 8, 2023
@msridhar msridhar marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2023 18:01
@msridhar msridhar changed the title JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods, and treat Guava as annotated when running buildWithNullAway Nov 8, 2023
@msridhar msridhar changed the title JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods, and treat Guava as annotated when running buildWithNullAway JSpecify: fix crash with calls to static methods Nov 8, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@msridhar msridhar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the fix! Couple of comments

@@ -1494,12 +1494,40 @@ public void interactionWithContracts() {
.doTest();
}

@Test
public void testForGuavaRawTypeBuildIssue() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rather than pulling in Guava here, let's just test for the core issue of static method calls of the form X.foo() where X is there explicitly. You should be able to write a standalone test case that exposes the previous crash, without importing Guava or adding the makeHelperWithGuava() method

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@akulk022 akulk022 Nov 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree. I have changed the test case to reproduce this scenario without using importing guava and ImmutableSet. Let me know if this works. I have removed the helper which imports guava too.

@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ tasks.register('buildWithNullAway', JavaCompile) {
sourceSets.main.compileClasspath)
options.errorprone.enabled = true
options.errorprone {
option("NullAway:AnnotatedPackages", "com.uber,org.checkerframework.nullaway")
option("NullAway:AnnotatedPackages", "com.uber,org.checkerframework.nullaway,com.google.common")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now that I think of it, let's not add this change here, and instead do it in a separate follow-up PR, just to make things cleaner

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, I have removed it from this branch.

@@ -1494,6 +1494,34 @@ public void interactionWithContracts() {
.doTest();
}

@Test
public void testForStaticMethodCallAsAParam() {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@akulk022 have you confirmed that this test fails with two unexpected errors if you remove the fixes in GenericsChecks?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I verified it for both scenarios by removing the fix and seeing if the test case fails with the same exception as before.

@msridhar msridhar merged commit 5aeb32c into uber:master Nov 8, 2023
9 checks passed
msridhar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2023
…dle (#857)

Based on the fixes made in #856 , we should no longer get that exception
after adding com.google.common in the annotated packages when running in
JSpecify mode.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants