Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test altmetrics integration #762

Open
vidiecan opened this issue Jun 8, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

test altmetrics integration #762

vidiecan opened this issue Jun 8, 2017 · 7 comments
Assignees
@kosarko
Labels
easy fix
Milestone
Backlog

Comments

@vidiecan
Copy link

vidiecan commented Jun 8, 2017

No description provided.

@kosarko kosarko added this to the Backlog milestone Jun 12, 2017
@stranak
Copy link
Member

stranak commented May 26, 2018

I see now it should be free to get the basic badges: https://www.altmetric.com/products/free-tools/

I think it is important enough to test.

@stranak stranak reopened this May 26, 2018
@stranak stranak modified the milestones: Backlog, Next milestone May 26, 2018
@vidiecan
Copy link
Author

but it does not work with handles (tested with our most used ones that have many references).

@vidiecan
Copy link
Author

last reply to a discussion I had with them is from 12/06/2017, I suggest to close this one.

@stranak
Copy link
Member

stranak commented May 26, 2018

OK, in that case please just ask them whether there are any plans to work with handles or whether there is some hard dependency on DOI system.

Looks like no luck for us :-(

@stranak
Copy link
Member

stranak commented May 26, 2018

Oh, I see you had asked. Then yes, lets close this and look for other options.

@stranak stranak closed this as completed May 26, 2018
@stranak
Copy link
Member

stranak commented Oct 27, 2023

I think it is the right time to re-open this. Altmetrics are still free: https://www.altmetric.com/solutions/free-tools/

And we now have DataCite DOIs, so we can use them on the records with DOIs.

@stranak stranak reopened this Oct 27, 2023
@stranak stranak added easy fix and removed wontfix labels Oct 27, 2023
@stranak
Copy link
Member

stranak commented Oct 27, 2023

@kosarko I am moving it to you just to put it in the right milestone and classify it, thanks. IMO it is probably important for NRP, definitely important for CU and possibly quite important for us too, depending how much it can help us track usage and citations of datasets.

kosarko pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 6, 2024
@milanmajchrak
UFAL/Enhanced type-bind feature (#762)
6c6de87 
* type bind is correctly rendered in the FE, but BE is still not working

* Synchronized the `submission-forms_cs.xml`

* Added doc into `submission-forms` about enhanced type-bind `field`

* Updated `local.cfg` for tests - added type-bind property

* Updated docs for the customized type-bind configuration property.

* Updated MetadataValidation following the type-bind customization.

* Added isAllowed function for multiple type-bind definitions

* Added some docs for the new method

* The values of the input wasn't loaded.

* Allowed fields could be empty when they should have values.

* Used isEmpty function and created constant for the `=>`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@kosarko kosarko

Labels
easy fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@vidiecan @stranak @kosarko