Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[production/RRFS.v1] add a new parameter to control if G-F cold starts or not #221

Merged

Conversation

JiliDong-NOAA
Copy link

After RRFS cycled DA switched to using saSAS, REFS members using G-F convection failed due to missing restarting variables. This PR will add a new parameter to control whether G-F will be cold started or not. The parameter will be set to false by default and won't affect any existing code logic/structure.

@grantfirl
Copy link
Collaborator

@JiliDong-NOAA @MatthewPyle-NOAA We were under the impression that the production/RRFS.v1 branch wasn't receiving any new development. Is this work really supposed to target that branch?

@MatthewPyle-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@grantfirl Things are a bit up in the air with RRFSv1, so this PR is intended for this branch, to open possibilities to use a different convective parameterization. Thanks for checking!

@jkbk2004
Copy link

jkbk2004 commented Sep 4, 2024

@grantfirl @dustinswales @rhaesung @MatthewPyle-NOAA All tests ran ok at ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#2405. This pr can be merged.

@grantfirl grantfirl merged commit cfe8a0c into ufs-community:production/RRFS.v1 Sep 4, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants