Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inconsistency in "library size" info #165

Open
JMarzec opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Inconsistency in "library size" info #165

JMarzec opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@JMarzec
Copy link
Member

JMarzec commented Sep 10, 2024

There seem to be inconsistency in the patient sample "library size" between the value reported in the report header (at the top, next to the sample name) and the value plotted in the "Library size" violin plot (marked by blue horizontal line, within the "Input data summary" section). In attached example (report screenshot) the reported Library size is 118.8 M reads, while on the plot it's marked at the value of 30 (the y-axis).

SBJ03172 RNAseq_report
@pdiakumis
Copy link
Member

Thanks Jacek!
I think those two are calculated/pulled out differently.
Let's look at how this was in the old master:

And now:

@skanwal
Copy link
Member

skanwal commented Sep 11, 2024

The one in the title reflect total number of reads. This is taken from a Dragen metrics file.
The barplot on the other hand uses sum of reads/1e6 for the calculations.

Think that's fine - the latter one is based on RNAseq analysis recommendations, I believe.
The value in the header was included for the curation team to have an estimation of total read counts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants