From f1f7eccb11a88da8712651bee06bbcf0b16f2edf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ll7 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 09:50:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add documentation for PAF24 meeting on 2024-10-28 --- doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md diff --git a/doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md b/doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md new file mode 100644 index 00000000..e6f54550 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/dev_talks/paf24/T03_2024-10-28.md @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +# Meeting 03 on 2024-10-28 + +**summary**: 2024-10-28 Time Boxing, Issues and PRs, Sprint Review Presentation, Group Size Decision, Sprint Planning Guidelines, Sprint Planning + +- [1. Time Boxing](#1-time-boxing) +- [2. Issues and PRs](#2-issues-and-prs) +- [3. Sprint Review Presentation](#3-sprint-review-presentation) +- [4. Group Size Decision](#4-group-size-decision) + - [4.1. Pro Large Group](#41-pro-large-group) + - [4.2. Contra Large Group](#42-contra-large-group) + - [4.3. Discussion](#43-discussion) + - [4.4. Decision](#44-decision) +- [5. Sprint Planning Guidelines](#5-sprint-planning-guidelines) +- [6. Sprint Planning](#6-sprint-planning) + +## 1. Time Boxing + +```mermaid +gantt +title Time Boxing 2024-10-28 +dateFormat HH:mm +axisFormat %H-%M +tickInterval 10minute +%% a comment +%% docs https://mermaid.js.org/syntax/gantt.html + +Issues and PRs: i, 14:00, 30m +Sprint Review Presentation: srp, after i, 20m +Group Size Decision: gsd, after srp, 20m +Sprint Planning Guidelines: spg, after gsd, 20m +Sprint Planning: sp, after spg, 100m +``` + +## 2. Issues and PRs + +- How do you create issues for the discussed work packages? +- How do you create branches for the issues? +- How do you submit the corresponding PRs? +- How do I review PRs? + +- [Project Management](../../development/project_management.md) +- [Git Workflow](../../development/git_workflow.md) +- [Review Guidelines](../../development/review_guidelines.md) + +## 3. Sprint Review Presentation + +- [Sprint Review Presentation](../../development/sprint_review_presentation.md) + +## 4. Group Size Decision + +< 19 Students + +- **Smaller Groups**: Members may have more direct control over tasks, but it might require more individual effort and responsibility. +- **Larger Groups**: Allows for more specialization, but requires a higher level of coordination and clear communication strategies to prevent mismanagement. + +### 4.1. Pro Large Group + +- Addresses a challenging project more effectively +- Simulates real-world team dynamics +- Supports task distribution among more members +- Allows deeper project insights through collaboration +- Greater resilience to student dropouts + +### 4.2. Contra Large Group + +- Increased coordination efforts +- Varied levels of participation may affect progress +- Difficulties in fair individual grading +- Potential for communication breakdowns +- Less individual responsibility per task + +### 4.3. Discussion + +- Participants can voice concerns or suggestions prior to voting to ensure an informed decision. + +### 4.4. Decision + +- Should the decision be made by majority vote? + +## 5. Sprint Planning Guidelines + +- [Sprint Planning Guidelines](../../development/sprint_planning_guidelines.md) + +## 6. Sprint Planning + +...