From afcd98a29dbf960e590aace324bfc11acf91f736 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Jurgen J. Vinju" <Jurgen.Vinju@cwi.nl>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 17:29:38 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] added original methods closure() and closureStar back in for
 backward compatibility

---
 .../java/io/usethesource/vallang/IRelation.java  | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/main/java/io/usethesource/vallang/IRelation.java b/src/main/java/io/usethesource/vallang/IRelation.java
index 77217a87..e90033ae 100644
--- a/src/main/java/io/usethesource/vallang/IRelation.java
+++ b/src/main/java/io/usethesource/vallang/IRelation.java
@@ -79,6 +79,14 @@ public default C compose(IRelation<C> that) {
         return w.done();
     }   
 
+    /**
+     * @return the transitive non-reflexive closure of a binary relation
+     * @throws UnsupportedOperationException when the receiver is not a binary relation
+     */
+    public default C closure() {
+        return closure(false);
+    }
+
     /**
      * @return the transitive non-reflexive closure of a binary relation
      * @param forceDepthFirst chooses the DFS algorithm over the BFS algorithm even though the size is small
@@ -100,6 +108,14 @@ public default C closure(boolean forceDepthFirst) {
         return next;
     }
 
+    /**
+     * @return the transitive non-reflexive closure of a binary relation
+     * @throws UnsupportedOperationException when the receiver is not a binary relation
+     */
+    public default C closureStar() {
+        return closureStar(false);
+    }
+
     /**
      * @return the transitive reflexive closure of a binary relation
      * @param forceDepthFirst chooses the DFS algorithm over the BFS algorithm even though the size is small