You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi.
I had the same problem with the missing header file in my Ubuntu18 machine arm cross compiler. It seems like a nice educational task to use GNU autotools to automatically detect if the compiler should use string.h instead. But I don't understand the gnu autotools weill enough make a solution myself. It seems possible to use autoscan to detect used header files but then there are some obstacles. Like using a cross-compiler and creating the actual rules to create rules patch the source code or whatever, handle autoconf in the entire project tree.
Any other thoughts on how to make this more portable or actually solve the autoconf rules?
Olof
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
autoheader seems to be the program that creates config.h.in where HAVE_MEMORY_H is defined. So it could be enough to include config.h the get that macro definition.
Hi.
I had the same problem with the missing header file in my Ubuntu18 machine arm cross compiler. It seems like a nice educational task to use GNU autotools to automatically detect if the compiler should use string.h instead. But I don't understand the gnu autotools weill enough make a solution myself. It seems possible to use autoscan to detect used header files but then there are some obstacles. Like using a cross-compiler and creating the actual rules to create rules patch the source code or whatever, handle autoconf in the entire project tree.
Any other thoughts on how to make this more portable or actually solve the autoconf rules?
Olof
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: