Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Bug]: GraphQL inconsistency in type on referral/discount endOfProgramTimestamp #9784

Closed
edd opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9796
Closed

[Bug]: GraphQL inconsistency in type on referral/discount endOfProgramTimestamp #9784

edd opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #9796
Assignees
@ettec
Labels
bug

Comments

@edd
Copy link
Contributor

edd commented Oct 13, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Problem encountered

vega/datanode/gateway/graphql/schema.graphql

Line 4333 in 27081f6

endOfProgramTimestamp: String!

vega/datanode/gateway/graphql/schema.graphql

Line 4366 in 27081f6

endOfProgramTimestamp: Timestamp!

vega/datanode/gateway/graphql/schema.graphql

Line 5990 in 27081f6

endOfProgramTimestamp: String!

vega/datanode/gateway/graphql/schema.graphql

Line 6010 in 27081f6

endOfProgramTimestamp: Timestamp!

vega/datanode/gateway/graphql/schema.graphql

Line 6251 in 27081f6

endOfProgramTimestamp: Timestamp!

Observed behaviour

The type is inconsistent

Expected behaviour

Data is treated the same

Tasks

  1. Make them all Timestamp

Steps to reproduce

1. Look at the schema

Software version

0.73.0-preview15*

Failing test

No response

Jenkins run

No response

Configuration used

No response

Relevant log output

No response
@edd edd added the bug label Oct 13, 2023
@edd edd mentioned this issue Oct 13, 2023
Closed
@gordsport gordsport assigned ettec and unassigned gordsport Oct 16, 2023
@ettec ettec mentioned this issue Oct 16, 2023
Closed
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this to Waiting Review in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from Waiting Review to In Progress in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@ettec ettec mentioned this issue Oct 16, 2023
Merged
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from In Progress to Waiting Review in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from Waiting Review to In Review in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from In Review to In Progress in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from In Progress to In Review in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@vega-issues vega-issues moved this from In Review to Approved in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Approved to Merged in Core Kanban Oct 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ettec ettec

Labels
bug
Projects
Core Kanban
Archived in project
Milestone
No milestone
3 participants
@edd @ettec @gordsport