Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Notebooks don't run #4

Open
ianhbell opened this issue Jun 8, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Notebooks don't run #4

ianhbell opened this issue Jun 8, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@ianhbell
Copy link

ianhbell commented Jun 8, 2016

I have thus far found no happiness trying to get the notebooks to run. I am most interested in the notebook pypge_play.ipynb, which when I run it complains:

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
AttributeError                            Traceback (most recent call last)
<ipython-input-3-484767f9bef2> in <module>()
     16     print_timing = True,
     17     log_details = True,
---> 18     fitness_func = FF.normalized_size_score
     19     )
     20 

AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'normalized_size_score'

Have the notebooks fallen out of sync with the core code? I tried to build based on both master and develop branches and no luck.

@verdverm
Copy link
Owner

verdverm commented Jun 8, 2016

Sorry, notebooks are probably our of date, the best end-to-end is in with
the megarun script flow.

I probably have local commits pending, not sure how behind GH is. Will take
a look later tonight.

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016, 6:25 PM Ian Bell [email protected] wrote:

I have thus far found no happiness trying to get the notebooks to run. I
am most interested in the notebook pypge_play.ipynb, which when I run it
complains:


AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last)
in ()
16 print_timing = True,
17 log_details = True,
---> 18 fitness_func = FF.normalized_size_score
19 )
20

AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'normalized_size_score'

Have the notebooks fallen out of sync with the core code? I tried to build
based on both master and develop branches and no luck.


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#4, or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABU4CBgDfH4tU6EqNrj39GSLH3wkYSOTks5qJgv8gaJpZM4IwfL1
.

@verdverm
Copy link
Owner

It's likely the notebooks are out of date.

I eventually had too much processing to do to want to keep it in Notebooks.

@ibell
Copy link

ibell commented Jun 11, 2016

That's really a pity... Having working notebooks would be great as minimal working examples. Going through the hassle of firing up several docker images to run anything is a bit annoying. I think I might be able to get @embg to update the notebooks now that we have some code that runs.

@dnhkng
Copy link

dnhkng commented Jun 27, 2016

I was hoping to use the notebook interface as well. ibell, have you got a working fork you could share?

@ibell
Copy link

ibell commented Jun 27, 2016

We are currently waiting on reply from @verdverm , in their current form they do not run, and need major updates to run.

@verdverm
Copy link
Owner

A few points...

  1. To get pypge running in notebooks, probably need to push a new version
    to PyPi. This will run like molasses in January.
  2. Think about this like a Spark or Hadoop platform. The deployment of the
    system is larger than a single machine and has a Python interface.
  3. My next efforts would be rewriting the core, then the search algorithm.
    As is, it does not scale well with input features.
  4. I work now and am trying to level up there. It is unlikely I will have
    much time for this. Sorry about that.
    Cheers,
    Tony

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016, 7:42 AM Ian Bell [email protected] wrote:

We are currently waiting on reply from @verdverm
https://github.com/verdverm , in their current form they do not run,
and need major updates to run.


You are receiving this because you were mentioned.

Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#4 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/ABU4CBFnPXfqNUtsvCGqgv9xQ708zp_oks5qP9NTgaJpZM4IwfL1
.

@ibell
Copy link

ibell commented Jun 28, 2016

@verdverm - It's a pity you don't have more time to dig into pypge stuff, but I totally understand. I've been developing another project in my free time, and I sympathize completely. It's very hard to find time to make progress on it, even if you want to.

We are/were super excited about the prospects of pypge, but our excitement has waned significantly. My student has the chops to make pypge really very useful, but he just needs a bit of assistance. I gather that assistance is probably not forthcoming. Again, a real tragedy. pypge has really such an exciting amount of potential.

P.S. I'll send you an email from work in the next day or so.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants