You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This idea was suggested by @mkeoliya - one possible way we could use proof reduction in the future is to use it for specification inference as well. Given an OCaml program - as the OCaml typesystem provides some constraints, we can infer what the footprint of a program is quite easily. Then, we can look for any higher order functions in the body of a program, look up the lemmas of them in Coq, and use the proof reduction to quickly test out candidates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This idea was suggested by @mkeoliya - one possible way we could use proof reduction in the future is to use it for specification inference as well. Given an OCaml program - as the OCaml typesystem provides some constraints, we can infer what the footprint of a program is quite easily. Then, we can look for any higher order functions in the body of a program, look up the lemmas of them in Coq, and use the proof reduction to quickly test out candidates.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: