Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

• Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
• Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

• Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

• Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
• New features should be documented.
• There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
• There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

• Is this flag really necessary?
• Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

• Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
• If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

• Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
• Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
• RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
• If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
• vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.44%. Comparing base (ab525d9) to head (d19f2ad).
Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #15885      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.42%   68.44%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1559     1559              
  Lines      196537   196646     +109     
==========================================
+ Hits       134484   134587     +103     
- Misses      62053    62059       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Hello, please explain again the nature of this PR. It frankly looks awfully automated and irrelevant to the codebase.

Hi @shlomi-noach, not sure why you felt this way. I've been contributing to vitess for a lot of time now, so I can assure you that these are not automated, can you please let me know what part was irrelevant or not required?

@beingnoble03 thank you -- and sorry. On second look these are appreciated additions. Recently we did have an influx of automated or suspicious contributions.
Appreciate the contribution!