Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

At Risk statement for ABNF not allowing an empty method-id-string #477

Closed
wants to merge 20 commits into from

Conversation

talltree
Copy link
Contributor

@talltree talltree commented Dec 8, 2020

This PR simply notes that some DID methods have expressed an interest in the possibility of resolving an DID method name by itself to discover metadata describing how to connect to the associated verifiable data registry. So there is a chance this one ABNF rule could change in the CR.


Preview | Diff

@jandrieu
Copy link
Contributor

jandrieu commented Dec 8, 2020

@talltree this looks like a new feature. Is there an issue or other mention before the feature freeze?

@peacekeeper
Copy link
Contributor

For reference, this has been previously discussed in #34, and in #216 the change was made to disallow an empty method-specific-id.

@talltree
Copy link
Contributor Author

@talltree this looks like a new feature. Is there an issue or other mention before the feature freeze?

Just for clarification, I did not realize that this PR included text from another PR that should not have been in it. I am cleaning that up ASAP. Also, as Markus mentioned, it is not a few feature, see #34 .

Signed-off-by: Drummond Reed <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Drummond Reed <[email protected]>
@talltree
Copy link
Contributor Author

Replaced by #484

@talltree talltree closed this Dec 11, 2020
@talltree talltree deleted the abnfatrisk branch December 11, 2020 00:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants