move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix #79

pfps · 2025-02-06T18:24:37Z

Fixes #62

pfps · 2025-02-06T18:26:59Z

@pchampin Do you know why the auto-publish is failing?

afs · 2025-02-06T18:47:52Z

Do you know why the auto-publish is failing?

See the job log - https://github.com/w3c/rdf-semantics/actions/runs/13185386283/job/36806138521?pr=79#step:3:985

Validate markup
  Validating index.html...
  $ pnpm add vnu-jar
  + vnu-jar 24.10.17
  $ java -jar "/home/runner/work/_actions/w3c/spec-prod/v2/node_modules/.pnpm/[email protected]/node_modules/vnu-jar/build/dist/vnu.jar" --also-check-css index.html
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3336.7-3338.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3340.7-3342.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3344.7-3348.21: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3348.22-3348.27: error: Element “code” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3348.41-3350.6: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3350.7-3350.131: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3350.163-3352.64: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3352.65-3352.138: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3352.193-3353.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3355.7-3356.43: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3356.44-3356.157: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3356.180-3363.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3365.7-3366.9: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3366.10-3366.110: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3366.127-3369.24: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3369.25-3370.63: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3370.64-3370.164: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3370.181-3371.18: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3371.19-3371.130: error: Element “dfn” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3371.149-3372.21: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3372.22-3372.130: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3372.151-3373.67: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3373.68-3373.168: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3373.186-3375.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3378.7-3380.8: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3380.9-3380.121: error: Element “a” not allowed as child of element “ul” in this context. (Suppressing further errors from this subtree.)
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3380.144-3381.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
    "file:/home/runner/work/rdf-semantics/rdf-semantics.w3c/spec/index.html":3383.7-3385.2: error: Text not allowed in element “ul” in this context.
  ❌  Not so good... please fix the issues above.
  Error: Process completed with exit code 1.

pfps · 2025-02-06T18:50:56Z

Thanks

TallTed · 2025-02-06T21:48:54Z

spec/index.html

+
+  <li>In the RDF 1.0 specification,
+    datatype D-entailment was defined as a <a>semantic extension</a> of RDFS-entailment.
+    In RDF 1.1 it was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF.


Suggested change

In RDF 1.1 it was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF.

In RDF 1.1, it was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF.

I do not view this as a desirable change.

@pfps — What's your argument against adding this comma? Perhaps my reason for adding it will be made clearer if you look at the preceding sentence, which starts In the RDF 1.0 specification,.

As an editor I feel that this change isn't needed.

I removed the comma from the previous sentence.

That's not the correct choice. The "In RDF 1.1" and "In the RDF 1.0 specification" are each an independent clause, and should be followed by a comma when they start the sentence. They could be moved to the end where they need not be preceded by a comma (e.g., Datatype D-entailment was defined as a <a>semantic extension</a> of RDFS-entailment in the RDF 1.0 specification. It was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF in RDF 1.1.), but this would make the meanings of the sentences less clear.

TallTed · 2025-02-06T21:54:35Z

spec/index.html

+    If there is a need to distinguish RDF 1.1 from the RDF 1.0 terminology,
+    the longer phrasing "simple D-entailment" or "simple datatype entailment"
+    should be used rather than "D-entailment".


Suggested change

If there is a need to distinguish RDF 1.1 from the RDF 1.0 terminology,

the longer phrasing "simple D-entailment" or "simple datatype entailment"

should be used rather than "D-entailment".

If needed, RDF 1.1's longer phrasing of "simple D-entailment" or "simple

datatype entailment" can be used to distinguish from RDF 1.0's shorter

"D-entailment" terminology.

I do not view this as a desirable change.

I am also a little bit confused by this change: It reads like the term "D-entailment" is only present in RDF 1.0, but that is not the case.

The sentence should probably be modified to not be specific to 1.1. I've put in a suggestion for this.

spec/index.html

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>

doerthe

I am fine with all the changes, but think that the last suggestion of Ted adds confusion.
I leave the discussion of commas to the native speakers :)

doerthe · 2025-02-11T12:43:29Z

spec/index.html

+      and introduced the special type
+      <a data-cite="RDF12-CONCEPTS#dfn-language-tagged-string"><code>rdf:langString</code></a>
+      for language-tagged strings.
+      The full semantics for typed literals is given in section [[[#datatypes]]].


Not sure whether the sentence "The full semantics for typed literals is given in section [[[#datatypes]]]." is needed. We describe changes between RDF 1.0 and RDF 1.1 and now link to the section in RDF 1.2?

pfps · 2025-02-11T15:11:16Z

spec/index.html

+    If there is a need to distinguish RDF 1.1 from the RDF 1.0 terminology,
+    the longer phrasing "simple D-entailment" or "simple datatype entailment"
+    should be used rather than "D-entailment".


The sentence should probably be modified to not be specific to 1.1. I've put in a suggestion for this.

spec/index.html

pfps · 2025-02-20T18:05:55Z

spec/index.html

+      The full semantics for typed literals is given in section [[[#datatypes]]].
+  </li>
+
+  <li>In the RDF 1.0 specification,


Suggested change

<li>In the RDF 1.0 specification,

<li>In the RDF 1.0 specification

pfps requested review from afs and doerthe February 6, 2025 18:24

This was referenced Feb 6, 2025

Update document for RDF 1.2 publication #78

Open

remove the only minor change comment in status #81

Merged

pfps force-pushed the changenotes branch from cfee2ae to 0f9a99f Compare February 6, 2025 18:51

move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix

9960ee8

pfps force-pushed the changenotes branch from 0f9a99f to 9960ee8 Compare February 6, 2025 19:17

pfps added the spec:editorial Minor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2) label Feb 6, 2025

TallTed suggested changes Feb 6, 2025

View reviewed changes

Update spec/index.html

b85445c

Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <[email protected]>

doerthe reviewed Feb 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

afs approved these changes Feb 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

pfps commented Feb 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

generalize from RDF 1.1

99e8e8b

doerthe approved these changes Feb 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

pfps commented Feb 20, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix #79

move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix #79

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025 •

edited by pr-preview bot

Loading

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025

afs commented Feb 6, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025

TallTed Feb 6, 2025

pfps Feb 6, 2025

TallTed Feb 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

pfps Feb 20, 2025

pfps Feb 20, 2025

TallTed Feb 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading

TallTed Feb 6, 2025

pfps Feb 6, 2025

doerthe Feb 11, 2025

pfps Feb 11, 2025

doerthe left a comment

doerthe Feb 11, 2025

pfps Feb 11, 2025

pfps Feb 20, 2025

	In RDF 1.1 it was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF.
	In RDF 1.1, it was defined as a direct extension to basic RDF.

	<li>In the RDF 1.0 specification,
	<li>In the RDF 1.0 specification

move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix #79

Are you sure you want to change the base?

move rdf1.1 change note boxes to change section in appendix #79

Conversation

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025 • edited by pr-preview bot Loading

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025

afs commented Feb 6, 2025 • edited Loading

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

TallTed Feb 11, 2025 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

TallTed Feb 20, 2025 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

doerthe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

pfps commented Feb 6, 2025 •

edited by pr-preview bot

Loading

afs commented Feb 6, 2025 •

edited

Loading

TallTed Feb 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

TallTed Feb 20, 2025 •

edited

Loading