Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hosting of the bistring status list context #182

Open
chumbert opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Hosting of the bistring status list context #182

chumbert opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
CR1 This item was processed during the first Candidate Recommendation phase. question Further information is requested

Comments

@chumbert
Copy link

chumbert commented Nov 7, 2024

Hello, I have a small question on referencing the Bitstring Status List context in VCDM 1.0 credentials:

With #91 and perma-id/w3id.org#3662, we can refer to the Status List 2021 context through w3c perma-ids.

I am under the impression however that this same change prevents referencing the bistring status list context that's here: https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list/blob/main/contexts/v1.jsonld

Is this second context intended to be hosted too, should implementers that use VCDM 1.0 with bitstring status lists reference it from somewhere else, or am I simply missing the correct url to reference it ?

Kind regards.

@msporny msporny added CR1 This item was processed during the first Candidate Recommendation phase. question Further information is requested labels Nov 17, 2024
@msporny
Copy link
Member

msporny commented Nov 18, 2024

Is this second context intended to be hosted too

Yes.

should implementers that use VCDM 1.0 with bitstring status lists reference it from somewhere else, or am I simply missing the correct url to reference it ?

We haven't set the correct URL to reference it yet, it will likely be something like:

https://www.w3.org/ns/credentials/bitstring-status-list/v1

but we expect most people to use the v2.0 context, https://www.w3.org/ns/credentials/v2, which includes it by default:

https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/blob/main/contexts/credentials/v2#L142-L202

Does this answer your question?

If so, I'm going to keep this issue open because we do need to:

  1. Decide what that URL is going to be for v1.0 and v1.1 VCs, and
  2. Make sure the context matches the v2 context and actually publish it at the corresponding URL.

@msporny msporny self-assigned this Nov 18, 2024
@chumbert
Copy link
Author

Thank you, this does answer my question. I'll keep an eye on this then.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CR1 This item was processed during the first Candidate Recommendation phase. question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants