Do we add a media types section?

[OR13]

I recall it being discussed.

If there was agreement to add a media types section, I am happy to do a PR for that.

[msporny]

Yes, I believe we have agreement to add a media types section (possibly called something to the effect of "Transformations to the core data model" section).

The presumption being that things that go in that section have transformation rules defined in the specifications referenced. I really don't want the registry maintainers to have to police that aspect of the registry, and perhaps they won't need to given that we don't expect an explosion in media types?

In any case -- +1 to creating a media types section... and then possibly iterating on it if people want the section title to be something else.

[OR13]

I took a stab at this in https://github.com/w3c/vc-specs-dir/pull/13/files

[msporny]

I took a stab at this in https://github.com/w3c/vc-specs-dir/pull/13/files

Crap, I didn't see your PR before raising my PR, which attempts to do the same sort of thing :(

#14

Differences:

• PR 13 specifies whether a mapping is unidirectional or bidirectional, which is an important thing to note.
• PR 14 uses the same registration mechanism as the rest of the directory.

I suggest we map PR 13 to the registration mechanism provided in PR 14, effectively bringing both PRs in.