Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Requiring Thing or not in @type #1968

Open
egekorkan opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Requiring Thing or not in @type #1968

egekorkan opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
Semantics Semantics-related issues

Comments

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

In #1345 we have noticed that without @type:Thing SHACL validation doesn't happen since it is ignored (all N3 TDs are valid). This brings the question whether we should require @type:Thing to be present in TDs. Even though it would be a small change, it is a big decision since all current TDs without Thing in @type will become invalid.

Some evaluations to do beforehand:
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels label Feb 7, 2024
@egekorkan egekorkan added Semantics Semantics-related issues and removed needs-triage Automatically added to new issues. TF should triage them with proper labels labels Mar 4, 2024
@egekorkan egekorkan mentioned this issue Mar 4, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Semantics Semantics-related issues
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@egekorkan