You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an editor of the specification, I'm requesting a TAG review of VC-JWTs.
Verifiable Credentials (VCs) permit several forms of providing security around
the data model. JWTs provide a
widely deployed approach to signing information. This specification
provides the details necessary to utilize JWTs as a securing mechanism
for verifiable credentials.
Relevant time constraints or deadlines: The VCWG is planning to take this specification to Candidate Recommendation in September 2023 (at W3C TPAC), reviews before that time frame (ideally, by the end of July 2023) would be ideal.
Major unresolved issues with or opposition to this specification:
There is some consideration over whether or not plain JSON representations should be covered in this specification or at IETF
This work is being funded by: The members of the W3C VCWG that are actively participating in the development of these specifications including funding from the US Federal Government, the European Commission, and the Canadian Federal Government.
You should also know that...
This work intersects heavily with the Verifiable Credentials v2.0 work, which is also something that the TAG will be actively reviewing around the same time.
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:
☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As an editor of the specification, I'm requesting a TAG review of VC-JWTs.
Verifiable Credentials (VCs) permit several forms of providing security around
the data model. JWTs provide a
widely deployed approach to signing information. This specification
provides the details necessary to utilize JWTs as a securing mechanism
for verifiable credentials.
Further details:
You should also know that...
We'd prefer the TAG provide feedback as:
☂️ open a single issue in our GitHub repo for the entire review
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: