You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the CDTS server's version of that folder appears to be outdated compared to this repo's counterpart. It doesn't seems to be derived from a recent release either.
To verify, try running a diff between the server vs the repo's version of ESDC's intranet mega menu include:
CDTS server (both files are identical, but look super outdated):
Other files in the public/global/ folder are probably also affected
Any chance the server could be brought up to date with the repo's version? Could anything be done to automate it going forward?
Thanks :)!
PS:
Going by the CDTS server's folder browser, it looks like the server's gcintranet and gcweb folders contain version subfolders named after CDTS release tags. By comparison, the global folder lacks version subfolders (probably because it's meant to be "evergreen").
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, the file in the repo was updated after the latest CDTS release (v5.0.0). This is why you see the discrepancy. The file on the server will be brought up to date upon the next CDTS release.
We have recently introduced an automated way of updating the file (gets the updates from esdc.prv) but it will still be dependent on the CDTS release schedule.
Hi,
I noticed that the CDTS server's version of that folder appears to be outdated compared to this repo's counterpart. It doesn't seems to be derived from a recent release either.
To verify, try running a diff between the server vs the repo's version of ESDC's intranet mega menu include:
public/global/
folder are probably also affectedAny chance the server could be brought up to date with the repo's version? Could anything be done to automate it going forward?
Thanks :)!
PS:
Going by the CDTS server's folder browser, it looks like the server's
gcintranet
andgcweb
folders contain version subfolders named after CDTS release tags. By comparison, theglobal
folder lacks version subfolders (probably because it's meant to be "evergreen").The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: