-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clarify relation to existing storage APIs #24
Comments
Maybe the wording should be different. The Storage Standard defines the infrastructure and a little bit of API surface around that infrastructure. All the other APIs, such as the Cache API, localStorage, IndexedDB, etc. provide APIs to store bits into the infrastructure provided by the Storage Standard. |
That seems reasonable, but it doesn't explain how I would know that my, for example, localStorage entries are persisted, since the new API seems to be completely unaware of the other APIs. Shouldn't there be a connection somewhere? |
Yeah, that is #18 basically. We need to recast existing APIs to make sure to put their bits in the box. |
Alright, I'll follow that. |
The introduction starts with
Under 3. I found this note:
Which helps explain why there's nothing about actually storing and retrieving data. But as of now, I can't tell, for example, how I'd actually store something in combination with
navigator.storage
. ThatStoreManager
interface doesn't expose anything that could be used to actually store something; the Promises made only contain booleans.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: