Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merge with https://github.com/NaturalHistoryMuseum/ckanext-ldap #1

Open
aliceh75 opened this issue Sep 30, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@aliceh75
Copy link

Hello,

It looks like this plugin and the one at https://github.com/NaturalHistoryMuseum/ckanext-ldap were developed pretty much at the same time.

No point having multiple plugins, maybe we could join forces? the Natural History Museum plugin has a lot more features - maybe it would make sense to merge into that one. Is there anything that this plugin does that is not handled by the Natural History Museum one?

@tobes
Copy link
Contributor

tobes commented Oct 8, 2014

Hi,
Only just got this, github is getting really crap about sending notifications.

I suppose the main difference is that this one is incredibly simple. Skimming what you have I think the differences I see are.

  • forcing ldap usernames to lowercase which is pretty stupid but needed by the client
  • Automatically making users sys admins depending on ldap group (and updating across logins)
  • Replaces the Ckan user stuff as this is now all done via ldap

This was created for a specific client, with specific needs - And unfortunately they are no longer funding this. I agree that it would be good to look at merging these but I'm not sure of the practicalities of it. Switching to your extension would break things for my client I think due to how users appear to be handled.

Maybe the best approach is just to reference each-other in our readme files.

I am aware of at least one other person who has been using this extension.

4 months ago we could probably have worked together well

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants