How https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/ is used in the specification

[steingod]

The document links to https://www.w3.org/TR/dwbp/, but would it make sense to make a clear mapping between section 8.2 there which recommends the following descriptive metadata fields:

• The title and a description of the dataset.
• The keywords describing the dataset.
• The date of publication of the dataset.
• The entity responsible (publisher) for making the dataset available.
• The contact point for the dataset.
• The spatial coverage of the dataset.
• The temporal period that the dataset covers.
• The date of last modification of the dataset.
• The themes/categories covered by a dataset.
• The title and a description of the distribution.
• The date of publication of the distribution.
• The media type of the distribution.

and the current WMCP 2.0 model? The elemnts above are easier to understand for most as they map to clearly defined features of the discovery metadata. This model is sometimes hard to identify in the current draft document. In combination with links in Table 2 in section 7 this would improve guidance to users.

[tomkralidis]

TT-WISMD 2022-11-04:

• could be an increased level of effort to maintain (would need to do for 1..n standards?)
• might be valuable for guidance documents

[tomkralidis]

TT-WISMD 2023-09-13:

• this would be valuable for communities to have a better understanding related to other standards
• we can include this as part of WCMP2 best practice
• we may want to consider additional standards to crosswalk as well

Once WCMP2 is ready for INFCOM-3, we will start working on a best practice document that will include the above