Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test on TUM-VI dataset #1

Open
zang09 opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Test on TUM-VI dataset #1

zang09 opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@zang09
Copy link

zang09 commented Jul 28, 2020

Did you test on TUM-VI dataset?
In my case, EuroC dataset is working well, but in TUM dataset there is no feature on image!!

Screenshot from 2020-07-28 12-11-14

Do you have any idea???

@xiefei2929
Copy link
Owner

I haven't test on TUM-VI dataset. Let me see see.

@xiefei2929
Copy link
Owner

Did you test on TUM-VI dataset?
In my case, EuroC dataset is working well, but in TUM dataset there is no feature on image!!

Screenshot from 2020-07-28 12-11-14

Do you have any idea???

我分析,这两个数据集的相机畸变的参数不一样,问题可能出在这了

@zang09
Copy link
Author

zang09 commented Aug 2, 2020

but i use tum_512.yaml file parameters not in euroc.yaml file!

@xiefei2929
Copy link
Owner

EuroC Camera.type: "PinHole" Tum_512.yaml Camera.type: "KannalaBrandt8"
They have totally different parameters which need to be dealt with separately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants