Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(feature req) Option to download list of contents only #72

Open
WolfyD opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

(feature req) Option to download list of contents only #72

WolfyD opened this issue Apr 24, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@WolfyD
Copy link

WolfyD commented Apr 24, 2023

It would be nice to have an option that doesn't actually download the contents, only titles with a --list command or something similar.

I have hundreds of gigabytes of stuff, and it would be nice to just have a list of all my e-books for example, without having to wait days for all of the actual content to download.

The output could just be a JSON (or XML) file or a continuous text output to STDOUT in the format:

Bundle name
|-- Item name
    |-- (optional list of available formats

Or something along those lines

@Greeley
Copy link

Greeley commented Mar 30, 2024

Hey @WolfyD, I'm not sure this repository is maintained so much anymore, I have submitted a pull request for multi-processing, should solve your waiting days problems (given that your network can cooperate)

On my profile you can find this repo with the multiprocessing patch and trove patch.

Multiprocessing currently isn't for trove.

I like this idea, I'd be happy to try and work this feature out for you, if it's something you are still interested in, and haven't found elsewhere.

@sparr
Copy link
Contributor

sparr commented Jul 29, 2024

@Greeley Do you expect to merge the upstream changes, or will your fork continue to diverge? I'd be happy to contribute to a more active fork.

@Greeley
Copy link

Greeley commented Nov 25, 2024

@sparr I have a PR in upstream for my multiprocessing changes.

I will probably continue to diverge my fork. Sorry for the late reply, I wasn't very active (in general) but expect to be more active moving forward.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants