Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sorting doesn't work on Oracle Database #8

Open
ilieandriuta opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Sorting doesn't work on Oracle Database #8

ilieandriuta opened this issue Aug 6, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@ilieandriuta
Copy link

Please see the following JIRA issue.

@ilieandriuta ilieandriuta added this to the 1.10.4 milestone Aug 6, 2018
@acotiuga acotiuga removed this from the 1.10.4 milestone Sep 19, 2018
@petrenkonikita112263
Copy link

AFAIU, this is the issue for livetable on XWiki with Oracle DB. Still, in this app, the livetable doesn't have the same columns used to reproduce the bug (Short Text Field, a User Field, and a Group Field). The Ideas app didn't fit the requirements to reproduce an issue.

@oanalavinia
Copy link

The app has the Assignee field, which is the one that should be used for reproducing the issue if you look at the Ideas specific jira ticket https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/IDEAS-69 (it was closed just because a general one was created)

@petrenkonikita112263
Copy link

Okay, then next from this , the version is used 8.4.5, and as I assume, same for the main issue. Oh, it doesn't matter; only configure oracle to 11.10 instead of hsqldb to see this issue.

@oanalavinia
Copy link

8.4 was the minimal supported version at that time, so this is why ideas was tested with this version. But the main issue is still open, so the ideas specific bug should still reproduce until the latest version of XWiki.
It should be enough just to confirm that it still reproduces on 11.10 for the Assignee field.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants