New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Supertype/Format classifications #2 (create by Tim in May 2021) #2

Open

MaggieZhaoYale opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 0 comments

Collaborator

MaggieZhaoYale commented Feb 24, 2023

If we implement the https://git.yale.edu/LUX/metadata-schema/issues/73, can http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300435443 (object/work type) be used for types and http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300226816 (form attributes) be used for formats? The definition of http://vocab.getty.edu/aat/300435443 cites "painting, book, cathedral" as examples, and the first two are filed under formats in the proposed scheme--so not sure whether the concepts align.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment