Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improvement - configurations By entity #98

Open
phamorais opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Improvement - configurations By entity #98

phamorais opened this issue Feb 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@phamorais
Copy link

phamorais commented Feb 7, 2024

Hi @yllen

Firstly congratulations on the plugin.

I would like to know if it is possible to make the plugin settings separate by entity, as currently all enabled rules are applied from outside Global (for all entities).

However, in some cases, the rules should not be applied to all entities. By separating the rules by entity, we would have a more personalized way of using the rules of this plugin for child entities.

@yllen
Copy link
Owner

yllen commented Mar 6, 2024

You can't had separate configuration per entity for all parameters.
Example: ticket's number are always for all entities.
Which parameter would you like to have per entity?

@yllen yllen self-assigned this Mar 6, 2024
@yllen yllen added the question Further information is requested label Mar 6, 2024
@rafaths
Copy link

rafaths commented Mar 11, 2024

Would it be possible to add another parameter to form the format of the ticket number, for example 'ymde0001' where the 'e' would be the entity's id? I need to differentiate tickets by entity.

@phamorais
Copy link
Author

Hi @yllen

I completely agree that the number of tickets cannot be separated by entity, given that the GLPI base uses this value as incremental.

However, all other fields (from the little understanding I have) can be separated by adding entity validation.

In my case, our needs would mainly be the fields:

-*
image

the option "Protect from simultaneous update" I don't know what its purpose is. So don't include it in the list.

With the use of GLPI through an ESM (enterprise service manager), the use of the software for other areas of the company is growing very quickly, and the Behaviors rules help us a lot. However, when using many different entities and service areas, the service rules generally differ between areas. I believe it would be a great improvement to the plugin.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants