Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Problem with item frames on 1.17 #192

Closed
etmclovin opened this issue Jun 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Problem with item frames on 1.17 #192

etmclovin opened this issue Jun 12, 2021 · 4 comments
Labels
Compatibility Issues or PR related to Minecraft versions compatibility.

Comments

@etmclovin
Copy link

Whenever i make a make using /tomap it creates it fine but if it is over 1x1 and i try to put it on a item frame it doesnt fill all of them and when i take it back it disappears. This only started happening after i upgraded to 1.17
@AmauryCarrade AmauryCarrade added the Compatibility Issues or PR related to Minecraft versions compatibility. label Jun 12, 2021
@AmauryCarrade
Copy link
Member

AmauryCarrade commented Jun 12, 2021 •
edited
Loading

ImageOnMap is not yet compatible with 1.17. While upgrading (when Spigot and Paper's maps support will be ready) we'll keep an eye on this. Thanks!

Related: #191

@Vlammar
Copy link
Member

Vlammar commented Jun 13, 2021

This is caused by splatermap that is no longer working. 1.17 has changed the path to the class used by the reflection. For this specific case we have an issue with ItemStack The old path format was net.minecraft.server.v1_17_R1.ItemStack and now we use net.minecraft.world.item.ItemStack .

@etmclovin
Copy link
Author

Is there an ETA on the fix?

@AmauryCarrade AmauryCarrade mentioned this issue Jun 22, 2021
Open
6 tasks
@AmauryCarrade
Copy link
Member

Closed on behalf or #198

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Compatibility Issues or PR related to Minecraft versions compatibility.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@AmauryCarrade @Vlammar @etmclovin