-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Only one pair of homologous chromosomes were not phased #21
Comments
The evidence is quite weak and I do not think the results are reliable. The two parents may be too closely related to be well distinguished. If you want to force the phasing, you may adjust the parameters by varying |
Thank you for your reply! |
I prefer to not to phase it unless the data of two parents are available. But assembling two haplotypes is okay. |
At first I don't know which chromosomes belong to one subgenome, so I use this SubPhaser. I will try to finish the switch error analysis to test my assambly. And proceed with downstream analysis and get back to you if there is further questions. Thanks! |
I prefer to not to phase it unless the data of two parents are available. But assembling two haplotypes is okay. |
Hi~
SubPhaser is a great piece of software, I have suffered some problems when I use this software to phase my diploid genome.
After the previous hic scaffolding, I got 22 superscaffolds, then I want to divide these scaffolds into 2 parts(2n=2x=22).
so I used this SubPhaser(-k 17 -q 50 -f 1.5), then 20 superscaffolds were phased and only 1 pair of homologous scaffolds(scaffold_9 and scaffold_10) were not phased.
k17_q50_f1.5.kmer_freq.pdf
k17_q50_f1.5.kmer_pca.pdf
k17_q50_f1.5.ltr.insert.density.pdf
How can I solve this problem?
Looking forward to your reply!
Yang
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: