Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

About Monocular Depth or Normal Loss #33

Open
buddyhs opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

About Monocular Depth or Normal Loss #33

buddyhs opened this issue Sep 7, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@buddyhs
Copy link

buddyhs commented Sep 7, 2024

Thank you for your excellent work. The training results are very good. I have another question. Since PGSR can already render depth maps and normal vectors, can the current code add single-purpose depth or normal losses to constrain more accurate model generation?

@ywcmaike
Copy link
Member

ywcmaike commented Sep 8, 2024

It depends on the generalization ability of the pretrained depth or normal models.
From my perspective, in the texture-less areas or some ambiguous areas, using the prior of the pretrained normal or depth model may help improve the quality of the surface reconstruction.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants