We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
https://openai.com/12-days/
国内文章: https://www.infoq.cn/article/WXPMviOWQ1LNZhqZC5ZE
核心为:
应用层面的创建无疑是收入的一个重要增长点. 但是对于 OpenAI 来说, 应用不是杀手鐗, 模型才是.
所以这里面除了影响营收的 Pro 版本的收费, Sam 仅参加了模型相关发布 o1, Sora, o3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
感觉有意义的点还不如 #167 不过都在一个发力: 逻辑性
AI 的幻觉问题比较严重, 这个问题其实也是 AI 缺乏逻辑性的一个表现.
可是人类的神经元就可以让自己有逻辑, 那 AI 为什么不能?
这就是 AI 的下一步方向, 不是找更多数据, 而是利用当前数据如何让 "逻辑性" 显现.
这种逻辑性, 而非知识性的问题我们也遇到了. 针对一些稍微复杂一点的逻辑问题, 当前主流模型都回答得不好 (应该说不对).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
https://openai.com/12-days/
国内文章: https://www.infoq.cn/article/WXPMviOWQ1LNZhqZC5ZE
核心为:
应用层面的创建无疑是收入的一个重要增长点. 但是对于 OpenAI 来说, 应用不是杀手鐗, 模型才是.
所以这里面除了影响营收的 Pro 版本的收费, Sam 仅参加了模型相关发布 o1, Sora, o3.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: