-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix EmailAlreadyInUse issues #56
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e9d9c0a
proto: add more error reasons
patrislav f40f425
rpc: return more information in ErrEmailAlreadyInUse
patrislav 8fa73e4
rpc: allow for more than one guest account per project (duh)
patrislav 560cf58
rpc: more typed errors
patrislav 80b558b
proto: use 7xxx error codes
patrislav File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ | ||
/* eslint-disable */ | ||
// sequence-waas-authenticator v0.1.0 0162a6fb35dd49d6f4d924ebce4bceb847479f3a | ||
// sequence-waas-authenticator v0.1.0 93374d947ac55a97a4d3a9821262e850d787f549 | ||
// -- | ||
// Code generated by [email protected] with typescript generator. DO NOT EDIT. | ||
// | ||
|
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ export const WebRPCVersion = "v1" | |
export const WebRPCSchemaVersion = "v0.1.0" | ||
|
||
// Schema hash generated from your RIDL schema | ||
export const WebRPCSchemaHash = "0162a6fb35dd49d6f4d924ebce4bceb847479f3a" | ||
export const WebRPCSchemaHash = "93374d947ac55a97a4d3a9821262e850d787f549" | ||
|
||
// | ||
// Types | ||
|
@@ -699,7 +699,7 @@ export class TenantNotFoundError extends WebrpcError { | |
export class EmailAlreadyInUseError extends WebrpcError { | ||
constructor( | ||
name: string = 'EmailAlreadyInUse', | ||
code: number = 2000, | ||
code: number = 7000, | ||
message: string = 'Could not create account as the email is already in use', | ||
status: number = 0, | ||
cause?: string | ||
|
@@ -709,6 +709,58 @@ export class EmailAlreadyInUseError extends WebrpcError { | |
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
export class AccountAlreadyLinkedError extends WebrpcError { | ||
constructor( | ||
name: string = 'AccountAlreadyLinked', | ||
code: number = 7001, | ||
message: string = 'Could not link account as it is linked to another wallet', | ||
status: number = 0, | ||
cause?: string | ||
) { | ||
super(name, code, message, status, cause) | ||
Object.setPrototypeOf(this, AccountAlreadyLinkedError.prototype) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
export class ProofVerificationFailedError extends WebrpcError { | ||
constructor( | ||
name: string = 'ProofVerificationFailed', | ||
code: number = 7002, | ||
message: string = 'The authentication proof could not be verified', | ||
status: number = 0, | ||
cause?: string | ||
) { | ||
super(name, code, message, status, cause) | ||
Object.setPrototypeOf(this, ProofVerificationFailedError.prototype) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
export class AnswerIncorrectError extends WebrpcError { | ||
constructor( | ||
name: string = 'AnswerIncorrect', | ||
code: number = 7003, | ||
message: string = 'The provided answer is incorrect', | ||
status: number = 0, | ||
cause?: string | ||
) { | ||
super(name, code, message, status, cause) | ||
Object.setPrototypeOf(this, AnswerIncorrectError.prototype) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
export class ChallengeExpiredError extends WebrpcError { | ||
constructor( | ||
name: string = 'ChallengeExpired', | ||
code: number = 7004, | ||
message: string = 'The challenge has expired', | ||
status: number = 0, | ||
cause?: string | ||
) { | ||
super(name, code, message, status, cause) | ||
Object.setPrototypeOf(this, ChallengeExpiredError.prototype) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
||
export enum errors { | ||
WebrpcEndpoint = 'WebrpcEndpoint', | ||
|
@@ -725,6 +777,10 @@ export enum errors { | |
Unauthorized = 'Unauthorized', | ||
TenantNotFound = 'TenantNotFound', | ||
EmailAlreadyInUse = 'EmailAlreadyInUse', | ||
AccountAlreadyLinked = 'AccountAlreadyLinked', | ||
ProofVerificationFailed = 'ProofVerificationFailed', | ||
AnswerIncorrect = 'AnswerIncorrect', | ||
ChallengeExpired = 'ChallengeExpired', | ||
} | ||
|
||
const webrpcErrorByCode: { [code: number]: any } = { | ||
|
@@ -741,7 +797,11 @@ const webrpcErrorByCode: { [code: number]: any } = { | |
[-10]: WebrpcStreamFinishedError, | ||
[1000]: UnauthorizedError, | ||
[1001]: TenantNotFoundError, | ||
[2000]: EmailAlreadyInUseError, | ||
[7000]: EmailAlreadyInUseError, | ||
[7001]: AccountAlreadyLinkedError, | ||
[7002]: ProofVerificationFailedError, | ||
[7003]: AnswerIncorrectError, | ||
[7004]: ChallengeExpiredError, | ||
} | ||
|
||
export type Fetch = (input: RequestInfo, init?: RequestInit) => Promise<Response> | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
typo...
verifCtx
... I think call it ..verifyCtx
..?also, what is the code doing, and why..? it looks like its making multiple attempts to encrypt and update something..? is the underlining service prone to failing / timing out..?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's actually short for "verification context" 😄
The whole block comes directly from https://github.com/0xsequence/waas-authenticator/blob/master/rpc/sessions.go#L86.
For context, this is executed whenever the client/user responds with an answer to a challenge (e.g. after inputting code from email OR in commit/reveal flow, when the client provides the revealed auth proof). If we failed answer verification (e.g. incorrect code input by the user) AND if there is an existing verification context (always true for email flow), then we increment the attempts count in the verification context's encrypted data, re-encrypt that data, and store it back in the database.
This lets us keep track of failed attempts and prevent the user from trying every single code combination there is 😄
The one here is the same but for account federation/linking instead of authentication.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
understood :) thanks for explaining, sounds good