set up for a HHMI deploy re: #3332

[jmunroe]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

Merging this PR will trigger the following deployment actions.

Support and Staging deployments

Cloud Provider	Cluster Name	Upgrade Support?	Reason for Support Redeploy	Upgrade Staging?	Reason for Staging Redeploy
gcp	hhmi	No		Yes	Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

Production deployments

Cloud Provider	Cluster Name	Hub Name	Reason for Redeploy
gcp	hhmi	prod	Following helm chart values files were modified: common.values.yaml

[jmunroe]

This will go through additional iterations after the meeting tomorrow afternoon with HHMI.

I've already tested and deployed. To keep the changes persistent, I feel I should self-merge this. Is that the correct policy? (I think so -- but I don't want to overstep)

[GeorgianaElena]

@jmunroe, we have the self-merging policy defined at https://infrastructure.2i2c.org/contributing/code-review/#self-merging-as-a-2i2c-engineer.

I suggest documenting this particular case there also if you believe qualifies.

Also, this PR looks good to me 🚀

[consideRatio]

Nice @jmunroe!!!

Is this closing #3332 btw? Then you can add a fixes #3332 or closes #3332 in the PR description to have it close that issue. If you put it there instead of in the title, there will be a clickable link as well btw.

[jmunroe]

@jmunroe, we have the self-merging policy defined at https://infrastructure.2i2c.org/contributing/code-review/#self-merging-as-a-2i2c-engineer.

I suggest documenting this particular case there also if you believe qualifies.

Also, this PR looks good to me 🚀

Thanks @GeorgianaElena . I think the changes in this PR go beyond the guidelines for a self-merge so I will leave as they are.

[jmunroe]

Nice @jmunroe!!!

Is this closing #3332 btw? Then you can add a fixes #3332 or closes #3332 in the PR description to have it close that issue. If you put it there instead of in the title, there will be a clickable link as well btw.

Aha! I knew there was something like that but didn't know that the keywords were "fixes" and "closes". Thanks!

[github-actions]

🎉🎉🎉🎉

Monitor the deployment of the hubs here 👉 https://github.com/2i2c-org/infrastructure/actions/runs/6667481385